剧情介绍
BACKGROUND
Xu Tong is a documentary director. His work “Wheat Harvest”, was opposed by a small group of people for violating the privacy of sexual workers and copyright, ironically, these complaints help to let more people to know and watch this film.
WuHaoHao failed to film Xu Tong and used his materials about such incident as he couldn't get the copyright. Throughout the process of production, he criticized himself, the society, documentary format by deconstructing video, sound and text he got when he interview Xu Tong. Like using paper cutting, or his individual voice over to repeat the interview.
CONCEPT
The way the director criticizing documentary format by deconstructing the video, sound and text of his interview with Xu Tong inspired me to deconstruct all the Chinese characters for all the titles on the poster.
背景
徐童,紀錄片導演,他的作品《麥收》因涉及侵權與偷拍性工作者而引起小範圍反對,但諷刺地,這卻讓更多的人關注此片。
吳昊昊因未能得到徐童的允許,在製作該視頻作品中,所以他只能利用剪紙,或用個人旁白來重複訪問內容等方式製作。他解構視頻、聲音、文字的同時,發現原來也在批判自己、社會、和記錄片。
概念
海報的設計概念來自導演透過對紀錄片的視頻,聲音,文字,不斷解構而進行批判的這個行為,故海報中全部標題的漢字都被分拆,解構。
Xu Tong is a documentary director. His work “Wheat Harvest”, was opposed by a small group of people for violating the privacy of sexual workers and copyright, ironically, these complaints help to let more people to know and watch this film.
WuHaoHao failed to film Xu Tong and used his materials about such incident as he couldn't get the copyright. Throughout the process of production, he criticized himself, the society, documentary format by deconstructing video, sound and text he got when he interview Xu Tong. Like using paper cutting, or his individual voice over to repeat the interview.
CONCEPT
The way the director criticizing documentary format by deconstructing the video, sound and text of his interview with Xu Tong inspired me to deconstruct all the Chinese characters for all the titles on the poster.
背景
徐童,紀錄片導演,他的作品《麥收》因涉及侵權與偷拍性工作者而引起小範圍反對,但諷刺地,這卻讓更多的人關注此片。
吳昊昊因未能得到徐童的允許,在製作該視頻作品中,所以他只能利用剪紙,或用個人旁白來重複訪問內容等方式製作。他解構視頻、聲音、文字的同時,發現原來也在批判自己、社會、和記錄片。
概念
海報的設計概念來自導演透過對紀錄片的視頻,聲音,文字,不斷解構而進行批判的這個行為,故海報中全部標題的漢字都被分拆,解構。
我要评论
登录后参与评论
[已注销]
哇 刚看了10分钟忍不住赶来评价 好棒好棒好棒啊 吴昊昊真是个小变态 小天才 嫉妒!!
回复
举报
2020年11月25日
C
喜欢昊昊
回复
举报
2020年11月25日
晚不安
砍省影展主席推荐:关于“关于纪录片导演的纪录片”的纪录片。更让我惊讶的是这是一部拍摄主体缺席的纪录片。起初我还对形式和理念感兴趣:对传统的抛弃、对批判的坚持。吴昊昊的思考并不是film vs movie,而是film vs video。他预见了这个抖音与快手的时代,尽管态度是激进的。但这片越往后看越酸腐越幼稚,首先语速之慢令人发指,再者他的言论根本不是学术性的探讨。这是人身攻击还是自我反思?他的愤怒究竟来自于独立的审视还是被所谓“权力”的排斥?总之他对观点的展开缺乏深度,更像是跑题。但我再一次明确了我的观点:影像创作者与作品掌握最大的话语权——倘若这是一篇评论文章,那么它的效果是大打折扣的。吴昊昊本人清楚这一点,于是“强迫”观众在屏幕上阅读这种“指向性”。这样看来,《制作<批判徐童>》实际上是一次无意识的自我批判的见证
回复
举报
2020年12月27日

