剧情介绍
Louis XIV is no newcomer to Albert Serra’s filmography, the hero of his latest opus to date, The Death of Louis XIV (2016). This Sun King features a twin, even though, in the game of differences, it turns out that there are quite a few. Instead of Jean-Pierre Léaud, a non-professionnal actor whom Serra already worked with in his first films. Very different body weight, here in expansion, there in retention; a different way of putting his face in it: there, at the service of an astonished child’s gaze, here, singularly chubby, as if extending without any solution to all of his corpulence; here, the invention of sovereignty constantly reinvented, and there, the kingdom of innocence vaguely struck by idiocy. And the props: if the tale in the first version needed Versailles or an imitation of it, the second one reduces the palace to a luminous halo. True, this time we are stuck between bare walls, white-washed with pink coating (the color of twilight?) under neon lights at the ceiling. Here, for a long time, this king has been left to his own devices, moaning on the floor, with a stomach ache as severe as it is hilarious, with rare trinkets all around. Then we see spectators entering the field to see Her Majesty’s rants, his hair (as wigs were called then) and sumptuous clothes characteristic of that era, and spectators dressed in anorak. So what, then: capturing a performance? If the art gallery really frames the ? action ?, what we find here is calculation, cutting up, montage; in short: a film, and no misunderstanding. And a film whose paths familiar to everyone Serra’s work point to: aristocracy in all its grandeur, its stupidity and its agony, the representation of power, the forces of art. Between the sublime and the grotesque, between derision and the derisive, between Bu?uel and Dali, a royal figure engages in a quest for his death mask.
我要评论
登录后参与评论
_kevvv
就是觉得可以拍更短啊。这么长的文本设置其实完全多余啊...不就是前后的一个反差式互文来突表主题吗?那么在做前半段铺垫的时候不需要啰里八嗦这个也呈现那个也呈现,而结尾真的“内容定格”太长了,放到艺术馆展厅里还差不多...
回复
举报
2020年11月25日
本位
4.5 比路易十四要好,没有了剧情动机后凸显出原始的驱动力(匍匐的动作、痛苦的呻吟),更加纯粹的传递感受。而最后的变奏将观看-感受的动作抽离了出来,达到了自反。
回复
举报
2020年12月27日
bloom
讲真可能是世界上独一无二的匹配女性(或者说我)经痛的影像,血液的红、伴随翻覆的呻吟、地面带来的冰冷触觉、阵痛自怜哀怨忍耐以及他人的冷眼旁观与不适存在,乃至大脑里的奇异声音。哈哈,或许可见塞拉对suffering的提纯纯度。当然也不能抛开作品的背景——对路易十四死亡纪事理念的展示来看,太阳王是一具封塑像,栩栩如生,它在美术馆中的展出,将痛苦引来穿过了所有的边界。但一个展览作品的“电影化”到底带来什么,似乎又是另一个问题。是引导体验还是,这个封印物从精神到物质,从上层到下层的移动?
回复
举报
2020年12月27日